Kiriti Badam
① 他说过的话
6 条
但每次你将决策能力或自主权移交给智能体系统时，你都在某种程度上放弃了一些你的控制权。
指向原始笔记的链接
But every time you hand over decision-making capabilities or autonomy to agentic systems, you’re kind of relinquishing some amount of control on your end.
—— Kiriti Badam · [10:12]
但现在有了 AI，这些直觉必须重新学习，领导者必须变得脆弱去做这件事。
指向原始笔记的链接
But now with AI in the picture, those intuitions will have to be relearned and leaders have to be vulnerable to do that.
—— Kiriti Badam · [26:20]
截至今天，这并不是关于成为竞争对手中第一个拥有智能体的公司。而是关于，你是否建立了合适的飞轮，以便你可以随着时间的推移而改进？
指向原始笔记的链接
As of today, it’s not about being the first company to have an agent among your competitors. It’s about, have you built the right flywheels in place so that you can improve over time?
—— Kiriti Badam · [30:33]
我可能会甚至会说，如果有人向你兜售一键式智能体，那纯粹是营销。
指向原始笔记的链接
I probably will go as far to say that if someone’s selling you one click-agents, it’s pure marketing.
—— Kiriti Badam · [31:35]
我认为 Martin Fowler 在某个时候在 2000 年代有这个术语叫语义扩散，这基本上意味着一个人提出了一个术语，每个人都开始用他们自己的定义来糟蹋它，然后你就会失去它的实际定义。
指向原始笔记的链接
I think Martin Fowler at some point had this term called semantic diffusion back in the 2000s, which kind of means that someone comes up with a term, everybody starts butchering it with their own definitions and then you kind of lose the actual definition of it.
—— Kiriti Badam · [39:30]
如今构建真的非常便宜。设计更昂贵，真的在思考你的产品，你要构建什么。它真的会解决一个痛点吗？什么是如今更有价值的？
指向原始笔记的链接
Building is really cheap today. Design is more expensive, really thinking about your product, what you’re going to build. Is it going to really solve a pain point? Is what is way more valuable today?
—— Kiriti Badam · [64:53]
② 出现在这些集
1 集
- 《AI 产品不能照搬软件老办法：从高控制低自主开始》 — 作为联合主持
③ 他谈到的
点进去有真内容 —— 本页主要出口
Lenny · Aishwarya Reganti · 智能体 · 非确定性 · 主观能动性 · 评估 · 生产监控 · 持续校准持续开发 · 飞轮 · 行为校准