跨国深谈← 返回←代码行数 (lines of code)

集里怎么说它

• 《AI时代衡量开发者生产力：Nicole Forsgren 谈怎么测才不撒谎》(00:05起):本集说它作为生产力指标一直很糟糕，而在 AI 时代彻底失效：因为大模型天生输出冗长，用它做指标极容易被系统操纵，进而引入复杂性和技术债；但现在它有了新用途——用来区分人写的代码和 AI 生成的代码，以此追踪代码存活率和质量。

① 提到它的金句

7 条

如果目标是更多的代码行，我可以提示某物写出有史以来最长的代码并添加大量的注释。
If the goal is more lines of code, I can prompt something to write the longest piece of code ever and add tons of comments.
—— Nicole Forsgren · [12:56]

指向原始笔记的链接

我认为把 token 花费作为吹嘘的指标存在真正的危险，这就像人们吹嘘他们一天写了多少行代码一样。
I think there’s a real danger in making the token spend the metric to boast about, which is the same as when people boast about how many lines of code they’ve written in a day.
—— Max Schoening · [36:08]

指向原始笔记的链接

虽然智能体让写数千行代码变得容易得多,但围绕代码的工作流根本不是为共同探索而构建的。
while agents have made it so much easier to write thousands of lines of code, the workflows around code are not built for exploring together at all.
—— Nico · [12:20]

指向原始笔记的链接

他们审查的不是 10,000 行代码;他们审查的是一个他们能轻松理解并逐步走过的工作流,所以他们确切知道它会做什么。
And they’re not reviewing 10,000 lines of code; they’re reviewing a workflow they can easily understand and step through, so they know exactly what it will do.
—— Carlos González de Villaumbrosia · [35:08]

指向原始笔记的链接

任何做这行有一段时间的人都知道，代码行数是一个很糟糕的指标。
Anybody who’s been doing it any length of time knows that lines of code is a terrible metric.
—— 嘉宾 · [69:59]

指向原始笔记的链接

如果你在做某件事,而且你在搭建一个一万行的代码拐杖来绕过模型的缺陷,那你很可能在做错误的事情。
If you’re doing something and you’re building like this 10,000 lines of code crutch to work around the model flaws, you’re probably doing the wrong thing.
—— Tibo Sottiaux · [42:29]

指向原始笔记的链接

软件工程师的工作从来都不只是把代码行放到屏幕上。
The job of a software engineer has never really been about putting lines of code on the screen.
—— Jonathan Kelley · [18:17]

指向原始笔记的链接

② 出现在这些集

1 集

• 《AI时代衡量开发者生产力：Nicole Forsgren 谈怎么测才不撒谎》 — 作为概念

③ 关联

点进去有真内容 —— 本页主要出口

Lenny · Nicole Forsgren · DORA · SPACE · DevEx · 心流状态 · 反馈循环 · 认知负荷 · 技术债 · 幻觉