① 他说过的话

11 条

有几个机会的报酬会是两到三倍。我的内心被拉向了这个方向，而这一次我想用不同的方式来做。
There were a couple of opportunities that would have paid two to three times more. My heart felt pulled in this direction, and this time I wanted to do it differently.
—— Amandeep Khurana · [00:21]

指向原始笔记的链接

要摆脱一个游戏，你必须先赢得这个游戏，只有到那时你才会意识到这个游戏的徒劳，然后你才能从中解脱。
To be free of a game, you have to first win the game, and only then do you realize the futility of the game, and then you’re free of it.
—— Amandeep Khurana · [00:40]

指向原始笔记的链接

每一次合作都应该为我们产出几样东西。第一，对产品的反馈。第二，它需要创造出某种蓝图或打法手册，这样我们就不必再做那种类型的合作了。
Every engagement should produce a couple of things for us. One, feedback into product. Two, it needs to create some sort of blueprint or playbook, so we don’t have to do that type of engagement again.
—— Amandeep Khurana · [12:20]

指向原始笔记的链接

我们不是在尝试打造或规模化一个专业服务部门。这本质上是为了弄清楚如何以最好的方式把这项技术带进真实世界，然后把所有这些经验模板化，并把它们送出去，要么作为产品，要么作为蓝图。
We’re not trying to build or scale a professional services arm. This is essentially to figure out how to bring this technology into the real world in the best possible way, and then take all those learnings, templatize them, and give them away, either as product or as blueprints.
—— Amandeep Khurana · [13:00]

指向原始笔记的链接

实验室内部的薪酬包非常慷慨，比 FAANG 公司还要慷慨得多，而这在五六年前是不成立的。
The comp packages are very generous within the labs, much more so than the FAANG companies, which was not true five or six years ago.
—— Amandeep Khurana · [16:58]

指向原始笔记的链接

否则，如果它只留在一小撮人手里，AI 就不会在人类的尺度上兑现。它将保持集中在非常小的一群人中，并且仅限于那一小群人所能产生的影响。
Otherwise, if it only remains with a small set of people, AI will not play out at the scale of humanity. It will remain concentrated among a very small group, and limited to the impact that small group can have.
—— Amandeep Khurana · [18:56]

指向原始笔记的链接

如果你回顾历史，90 年代末网站开发者很稀缺，他们收费高得吓人。而今天，你只要打开这些工具中的任何一个，你打开 Lovable，输入一句话，它就会给你一个完整的应用。
If you look historically, in the late 90s website developers were rare, and they used to charge a bomb. Well, today you just go to any of these tools, you go to Lovable and type one single thing, and it’s going to give you a full app.
—— Amandeep Khurana · [19:47]

指向原始笔记的链接

我认为他是对的，但只对了一部分。90% 是对的。缺失的地方在于，要意识到游戏的徒劳，还有许多其他途径可以到达那里；不仅仅是赢得游戏。
I think he’s right, but only partly right. It’s 90% right. The thing that’s missing is that to realize the futility of the game, there are a number of other ways you can get there; it’s not just winning the game.
—— Amandeep Khurana · [21:07]

指向原始笔记的链接

所以我不会说我已经摆脱了游戏；那不是准确的描述。我能看到它的徒劳，但我还没有把自己从中解放出来。
So I won’t say I’m free of the game; that’s not the right characterization. I can see the futility of it, but I haven’t freed myself of it.
—— Amandeep Khurana · [22:37]

指向原始笔记的链接

我确实曾被别人定义的游戏缠住过。规则是别人定义的，什么是好是别人定义的。
I certainly got wrapped up in the game that was defined by somebody else. The rules were defined by somebody else, what good looks like is defined by somebody else.
—— Amandeep Khurana · [23:14]

指向原始笔记的链接

所以在那场对话中我们是平等的地位。一切都关于那场对话本身，你为它带来了什么，为它增添价值，并且尊重对方这个人，不是因为他头衔，而是因为他的想法。
So we’re on equal footing in that conversation. It’s all about that conversation, what you’re bringing to it, adding value to it, and having respect for the other individual, not because of their title, but because of their ideas.
—— Amandeep Khurana · [25:13]

指向原始笔记的链接

② 出现在这些集

1 集

• 《拒绝三倍薪酬进 Anthropic：一位 FDE 负责人的坦白局》 — 作为主持

③ 他谈到的

点进去有真内容 —— 本页主要出口

Anthropic · Amazon · AWS · Cloudera · Databricks · Palantir · Microsoft · Lovable · 前向部署工程师 · 前置部署工程

④ 也在聊「组织与领导力」的人